Wednesday, 24 July 2013
Improved coverage of Sussex on FamilySearch
FamilySearch have improved their coverage of Sussex parish registers with the addition of over 400,000 baptism, marriage and burial records taken from parish registers. These are index entries only with no access to the original image.
A list of the parishes covered can be found here and it looks as if more will be added at some time in the future (but no indication when).
I did a quick comparison with the Sussex Family History Group (SFHG) database with a search for my own surname and, although results cannot be directly compared because of the differences and idiosyncrasies between the databases, I found only 78 results on the FamilySearch database (48 if limited to exact spelling) but got results in 121 categories on the SFHG database which includes 125 events in Horsham alone (94 if limited to exact spelling). If you are a member of the SFHG you will get much better results from their database but you may find the FamilySearch database a much friendlier interface.
I searched the FamilySearch Sussex database for several known events (within the parishes and time periods listed as covered) without finding them - expanding the search to All Collections found the baptisms as part of other databases but there was no sign of the burial records. It suggests that the Sussex database on FamilySearch does not have complete coverage of events within the parishes & periods they claim. Hopefully this will improve soon.
Sunday, 7 July 2013
Bastards of Uckfield
Bastardy was a problem for every parish, partly from a moral viewpoint but largely for financial reasons. Mothers without a husband to support them and their child were likely to rely on the parish for assistance so if the parish could they would pass unmarried pregnant single women on to another parish or encourage the father of their child to marry them. There were various established procedures for handling the problem of illegitimacy.
A study of baptisms in Uckfield between 1700 and 1850 finds nearly 3,000 baptisms of which only 201 were for illegitimate children - just 7%. Of those 201 the priest has recorded the fathers name in 54 cases and a further 13 children are given a middle name which is probably their fathers name so for these children it might be possible to identify their fathers.
The number of illegitimate births is not evenly spread over the 150 years, there was just one illegitimate child baptised in the first decade of the 18th century and none in the second but this figure rose over the years with nearly 40% of the illegitimate births occurring between 1840 and 1850. This doesn't mean that illegitimacy was on the increase, as the graph below shows the birth rate was also increasing sharply.
Where paperwork has survived there can be more information about the parents and the illegitimate child. In the case of Mary Smith two examination documents survive, one taken when she was pregnant and the other after the birth of her child. From these and other sources it is possible to determine what happened to Mary and her daughter baptised in 1767.
A study of baptisms in Uckfield between 1700 and 1850 finds nearly 3,000 baptisms of which only 201 were for illegitimate children - just 7%. Of those 201 the priest has recorded the fathers name in 54 cases and a further 13 children are given a middle name which is probably their fathers name so for these children it might be possible to identify their fathers.
The number of illegitimate births is not evenly spread over the 150 years, there was just one illegitimate child baptised in the first decade of the 18th century and none in the second but this figure rose over the years with nearly 40% of the illegitimate births occurring between 1840 and 1850. This doesn't mean that illegitimacy was on the increase, as the graph below shows the birth rate was also increasing sharply.
Where paperwork has survived there can be more information about the parents and the illegitimate child. In the case of Mary Smith two examination documents survive, one taken when she was pregnant and the other after the birth of her child. From these and other sources it is possible to determine what happened to Mary and her daughter baptised in 1767.
At the age of 17 years Mary Smith
was meeting the appropriately named John Brown for assignations in Shermanreed
Wood near Uckfield; not surprisingly she soon found
herself pregnant and deserted. Nothing
is mentioned of what happened to John Brown but by the 9th February
1767 (the date of the second examination) he was a huckster 'late of the parish of Uckfield'.
It is possible that his name wasn't John Brown as when his daughter was baptised on the 25th January 1767 at Holy Cross in Uckfield she was named Mary Barham Smith.
Mary Smith (senior) had been baptised on the 21st May 1749 in Uckfield, the fourth child born to Richard Smith and Sarah (nee
Marten). She went on to marry John Weaver in 1769
when Mary was a few years old and they had two children, Lucy baptised in 1769
(five months after their marriage) and John baptised in 1770, both in nearby Isfield. Mary died in 1789 and her husband John in 1821, both are buried in Isfield.
Mary's daughter Mary Barham went
on to have an illegitimate child herself, William Barham Smith, who was baptised
in Uckfield on the 28th October 1787 before she married John
Funnel just over a year later, on the 1st December
1788. It appears that John and Mary had
a large family baptised in the parishes of Maresfield and Fletching.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)